My buddy Alan Specter had his puppet strings pulled again. Read all about it.
The only thing missing here is Bush’s mandate of God. Hey, I thought we declared independence from this kind of bullshit hundreds of years ago?
Thoughts about people and the crazy things they do.
My buddy Alan Specter had his puppet strings pulled again. Read all about it.
The only thing missing here is Bush’s mandate of God. Hey, I thought we declared independence from this kind of bullshit hundreds of years ago?
My cousin Lt. Ehren Watada is facing a rough road ahead as he sacrifices himself in an effort to wake up the United States government and the silent majority of this nation.
Ehren is a brave man to choose this path when so many before him could have but didn’t. Most people our age are thinking about starting a family, buying a house, settling down. Ehren is trying to change the course of history.
But he can’t do it alone. After all, a democracy isn’t about Ehren and what he says as an individual. It’s about a nation participating as a whole to systematically determine its future course. It’s about electing moral and strong leaders who accept responsibility for their mistakes and look forward.
Ehren is doing this because our nation should have done better, could have done better when deciding to wage an all out war on another country under false pretenses. He’s doing what our leaders haven’t. He’s doing what we haven’t done.
He is saying this war is wrong and it needs to end. It’d be nice if the rest of us could do the same.
Send Ehren your support, he needs every last bit.
Why has our legislature magically started to show up to work?
I think a quote from my favorite over-inflated gas bag in a recent article on CNN.com sums it up best:
In the closing moments of Senate floor debate last week, Specter looked ahead to the conference committee meetings and reminded fellow Republicans that midterm elections are looming.
“There is an important issue, political issue, about the ability of Republicans to govern,” the Judiciary Committee chairman said. “There is an election in November, and our leadership positions as Republicans is on the line. And I think that will weigh heavily in the conference.”
– CNN.com, Bush calls for House, Senate compromise on immigration
Has white noise in the media gotten so loud that the head of the senate judiciary committee — a group dedicated to fairness and lack of bias — can openly declare that legislative decisions for the people are being decided based on personal agendas of officials elected to represent them?
Have we grown so numb that we don’t even care?
If the new bills and the timing of immigration reform, tax breaks for the rich and anti-abortion legislation around the nation, and anti-gay bills backed by conservatives isn’t enough — this should serve as at least a little warning to those of you who blindly support anything people like Specter and Frist spoon-feed you.
Please, please, try to listen and understand what is really going on, and while you’re at it, vote for anybody (from either party) who won’t be thinking of themselves when they are voting and discussing these important issues.
These laws and others like them should be decided solely based on what is right and just for the American people. They shouldn’t be stepping stones for prolonging the political careers of people with questionable motives and secret agendas.
Election-driven legislation represents the core of what plagues our government. It is another external influence injected into a once honorable profession, and threatens our freedom more than any terrorist.
<rant>
Bizarre. That’s about the only way I can explain things. Baseball players are required to testify under oath in front of senate judiciary committees, but oil executives and district attorneys aren’t.

Sure enough, Mr. Specter, maybe you should have rethought how much you can trust people nowdays — especially people involved with the white house — and especially the ones who deny they were.
Although, I don’t think you thought very much at all about it. You probably just did what you were told. Either way — shame on you for not holding people accountable for telling the truth.
This crap has been building up for a while — so let me get some stuff off my chest. Let’s see — things our congress has focused on:
Things that were pretty much ignored:
So my response to this stuff — including Barry Bonds hitting seven-hundred-something home-runs? Get a grip, people. The country is going down the tubes and you’re worried about baseball records and steroids? Wake up.
Congress does a lot of great things, but lately I just don’t know what those things are.
</rant>
Open source can be any number of things, depending on who you’re asking. To the hacker it’s about teamwork, comradery, IRC, CVS or SVN and great flamewars. To the CEO it’s risky, and often times very dependent on highly-skilled staff who may or may not be here tomorrow. To Wall Street it’s a non-commodity with high risk and low returns. To mom and dad it’s a mysterious concept you’ve asked about many times but never quite understood. To my cats, it’s what makes me sit at the glowing rectangles for hours on end.
To all of us, though, it’s the future. Most of us agree on that much.
In my time here at OSU in Central Web Services and the Open Source Lab I’ve spent a lot of time thinking about open source, because I’ve been in the middle of it. Working with the Mozilla community has also taught me a lot about the masses and community development. I learned over the past three years that it’s less about the masses and more about individuals who care a great deal about where we’re all going.
So the #1 question people ask me is, “What is open source?” To be honest, I’ve stopped worrying about defining open source. Instead I’ve tried to appreciate it.
Does it really matter what open source is? If it’s an ideal, a business model, communication style, natural progression, another step in our evolution — I’ve stopped caring about trying to outline it and present it in a bulleted list.
To me it’s just chaos, and it’s wondrous. I’m so caught up in it. It’s intoxicating and pulls me in some undefined direction. Like riding in an airplane with an unknown destination. You don’t know the pilots or where you’re going but you’re still excited about the possibilities. Like stepping forward onto a stage, lights blinding, and having an act but still not being entirely sure about how the show is going to turn out.
Or maybe it’s an emotion. You can’t quantify sadness or jubilation. How do you explain the color yellow to a 5-year-old? You can’t. How do you explain happiness to a rock? You can’t.
So I’m done trying to draw blueprints for the stage, or profiling the pilots and passengers. I’ve given up and put down the pen.
Because no matter how many times I fill a whiteboard or flowchart, I leave the audience thirsty. They are given a little sip of an idea — ephemeral and slight as something like the American Dream. It’s something we all whisper about and pull for but can’t really define. It’s something driving us that seems so strong and powerful yet at times, in its tiny fissures and failures, it all seems so fragile and brittle.
It is what it is — whitewash pitted with valleys and riddled with amazing plateaus. It’s us reflected in code which is scary and unpredictable but it’s alright if we remember we’re in it together.
It’s life, and you can’t define life — you just live it.
Something doesn’t have to be intricately defined to have meaning.
Okay, I’ll admit it. I initially didn’t like the guy. He sat in the front row at Mavericks games, all riled up, fists pumping and emotions swaying with every call. He just seemed pretty obnoxious, which makes me hastily throw you in my “oh no, not him again” category.
Be careful about who you dismiss.
I spent a few hours last night replacing much-needed sleep with a complete tour of Mark Cuban’s life, courtesy of Google, Wikipedia and blogmaverick.com.
Sure enough — I was wrong. Somewhere behind the fist pumping, shouting at refs and NBA fines there lies a fricking brilliant man who I find terribly interesting and inspiring.
Inspired by Fountainhead, driven by something that is a lot like the open source “itch” we all know in the programming world, Cuban has gone from successful enterprise to successful enterprise by fixing things that piss him off.
It takes a tremendous amount of courage to reject the norm, and even more to recreate it. Don’t like what you’re doing today? Change it. Dante and Randall would have agreed. If you want to blame somebody for your situation, blame yourself.
Mark Cuban never let his situation control him. He wasn’t the guy at the kwik-e-mart saying, “…but I’m not even supposed to be here today!!”
WWMCD? He would have started up his own kwik-e-mart that put the other one out of business. Or, he would have moved on to something completely tangential that sparked his interest. He would have succeeded there, too.
Why? He’s a rare combination of grit, determination, preparation, research and luck. Obviously nowdays he is a bit blessed with a large bankroll, but before it took some cajones to step up to the plate and pitch the ideas he had. It took a lot of faith and determination in himself to make them succeed. That is what separates him from the rest of the rich slugs. He has great ideas, sure, but he also follows through on them.
And he eats his own words gracefully, too. Ask the people at Dairy Queen.
In a time when we don’t have leaders or good examples of Americans, I think Mark Cuban serves as a good icon. He’s worlds better than crooked senators or anybody in the White House simply because he’s a multi-billionaire and he still takes the time to keep up with blogs, speak his mind freely and uses his money for good causes. He is also not stopping his pursuit of what’s right, or at least what’s cool.
You don’t see Mark Cuban crying for the people he might hurt or upset because what he is saying may not necessarily be something they agree with. He isn’t constantly weighing media reaction to the truth before he speaks it. That makes him genuine. It makes him the most human billionaire I’ve seen or read about. It makes him someone I can believe and relate to regardless of how much money he has or what he’s done. He’s a guy with ideas and feelings, not some larger-than-life self-absorbed asshole. Well, a normal guy with a $40M jet he bought online.
He’s a guy who:
So, thanks Mark, for bringing back the Mavs (though I’m a Suns fan, I appreciate the Mavs too), and showing that being yourself and believing in what’s right (for everyone, not just yourself) can take you as far as you’re willing to go. Keep it up, dude.
Mark Cuban kicks ass. Chuck Norris ain’t got shit on this guy.
Edin thought it was funny that people who don’t have real problems sing angry songs.
So I thought about it on the drive home from Portland late Saturday night after we sent off Rick to Seattle. Some thoughts crossed my mind:
When I added it up, I started to realize that a large majority of the “happy” music I know was sang during some of the worst periods by people living through some major drama.
Where I tend to differ a bit, though, is that I find a lot of beauty in hard beats and rhythms created by people who probably didn’t have a legitimate gripe. Though I liked them especially if they carried a significant message — something closer to the heart than, “my dad didn’t by me an Escalade now I’m going to bust a cap.”
And while I tend to like bands like Stone Temple Pilots, Nirvana, Alice in Chains and Pearl Jam — I really did have to wonder what the hell all these guys were so pissed off about. Maybe it was their long hair, which was tangly and unmanageable.
Stevie and Ray were always smiling, even though they couldn’t see a damn thing, and the Duke didn’t grow up in the best of times.
I read a bit about Martin Luther King today, and I ventured past the typical biographical sketches into some of the less publicized issues he spoke on. One thing I found interesting was how a man of the cloth so readily upheld the separation of church and state.
King understood the reasoning behind the separation of church and state, something our leaders don’t. After thinking about it, his views were consistent with his support of freedom, justice and equality. In order to ensure freedom of religion and show no bias towards one faith, the government had to remain detached from any church.
Browsing took me towards Speaking Truth To Power: Martin Luther King On Church And State — a well written blog post found on blog.au.org, the home for Americans United for the Separation of Church and State. I’m not big into activist sites, but I suggest you take a look.
In the AU post, I saw their reference to an interview MLK had with Playboy. So I then found myself (no joke) reading Playboy’s full article on MLK, which I found to be really interesting. The post was very informative and insightful. Careful though, you might see some nipples (gasp!). (Yes, I only read the article — this time!)
Another interesting article was this article from towardfreedom.com that discussed King’s philosophical wisdom towards all kinds of issues.
King was a great leader because he didn’t lead for himself. He lead for a better world — a smarter more tolerant one. He strove for a greater good that was “good” regardless of race, religion, or sex. He didn’t abuse the system to achieve personal goals or agendas — for himself or his friends, and he only defied it when it was completely wrong.
He was strong, courageous and just. Unbelievably intelligent and well spoken, he commanded attention and respect. His type of leadership is what I’d like to see from the political leaders of today. There’s no doubt a man or woman with his qualities would make a great president, senator or supreme court justice.
It made me wonder why there aren’t great leaders anymore. Presidents used to be very special people (usually) who weren’t alcoholics, addicted to drugs, involved in scancals, or stupid enough to trade Sammy Sosa to the Cubs. They didn’t have spinsters or media monkeys talking about how good they were in order to cover up their incompetence. They did all the speaking, and the reporters would report — nowdays it seems like the reporters do most of the talking.
Where the hell are our great leaders? We need them so bad it hurts. Someone to unite, not divide. Someone who was marginally intelligent to help us focus on the important issues — serious problems we have to face, not stupid shit like steroids in baseball (seriously why the hell should congress give a shit about steroids — can you say, “complete waste of time and taxpayer money?”).
All that aside, I’ll take a leader we can at least trust. Someone who doesn’t bullshit us on a daily basis. Someone who shows up to work, puts in the time, and fights for us — for all of us. Martin Luther King would have done that. Our leaders today — well, I’m just not sure anymore. It seems like they made their own team, and I can’t afford the membership dues.
I’ll leave you with a quote that I think addresses “faith” and the problems it presents when it isn’t balanced by reason. Could be faith in a god, group, cause, leader, or an ideal. The bottom line is that faith cannot live alone — it needs science (facts) to confirm belief and justify actions.
Science keeps religion from sinking into the valley of crippling irrationalism and paralyzing obscurantism.
— Martin Luther King
Many of the problems — the real problems — we face today are the result of decisions based more on faith than on science. I hope the coming years bring balance to our thinking, and somewhere along the way we find reason.
Last but not least, make sure to read this article at the Dailiy Kos. Despite a daring comparison between what Gore said yesterday and King’s speech 40 years ago, it had a great common message — whatever the problems we have today, we — the people, us, you and me — are the solution, not the powerful few.
Is it hard to find great leaders, or is it just hard to find great leaders that aren’t destroyed by the crappy ones?
Some of you are pretty smart. So you understand the difference between simple and complicated, right? So why complicate things for the sake of complication?

My Dad used to say that habit is a five-letter word that can dictate your life. Indeed, it does — especially in technical professions. It’s why most things are almost impossible to describe to the layman. Poor layman, nobody remembers to fill him in. Or is it a layperson? You get the point.
Imagine spending 50+ hours a week speaking in latin medical terms, Java acronyms or Linux system jargon. Now imagine turning around and telling a 5th grader what you did at work that week. Not so easy, is it?
You’re used to your dialect. It’s burned into your head. But that doesn’t mean you can’t escape it in order to reach the middle ground with people who aren’t up to their necks in the same sort of shit you always find yourself in.
Pull yourself out of the muck for a while and remember how to speak like a normal person. Leave out the big words, particularly in technical discussions that don’t have room for a thesaurus or world almanac. Use simple metaphors. Explain things using real-world examples.
People don’t need to hear your completely misplaced word-of-the-day exercises in order to understand your point. And if you can’t explain it in simple terms, then maybe you don’t understand what you’re trying to explain after all?
Eschew obfuscation, assface.
Wake up, eat breakfast, ride the MAX. Convention buzz; free stuff, lights, displays, vendors and myriad sessions to attend. After-parties; free booze, free food, mingling. Sleep for a few hours. Repeat.
OSCON was something different for everyone. I’ve read through countless blogs about language wars, what’s hot or not, great epiphanies or laughing stocks. I didn’t find anything so life-altering that I feel the need to strap on my asshat and preach about this or that from my small little soapbox.
I will say that seeing everyone pulled together was very interesting. I couldn’t help but be amazed by the community — the people, not the booths. The faces and ideas were far brighter than the lamps in the exhibition hall.
Having never been to a conference like this before, I was pretty excited. I had never seen so many people with similar interests gathered in the same place. It was my first chance to meet a community I have known for so long but had never met in person.
After my first day, I asked myself what did I learn today? And most of what I learned had nothing to do with code but more to do with people:
Having been there, I now have this positive feeling of some sort of global/communal pride. The open source community is full of problem solvers. They find solutions to real-world problems everyday. They bang their heads on bugs, drink lots of caffeine, lose sleep over things and drink beer when they can. And the whole time they have fun doing it. Sounds a lot like what I do.
So I felt like I was a part of something. As corny as it sounds, that was the biggest impression OSCON made on me. We are the firefighters of the digital world, the construction workers of the IT industry, and the police of the internets. We all have our roles, we all contribute in some way, and every once in a while we come together at some convention like OSCON and celebrate it.
OSCON was a little like a family reunion. There were mothers, fathers, and the estranged cousin nobody likes.